home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=93HT0345>
- <link 89TT0189>
- <title>
- 1960s: Sexual Revolution
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1960s Highlights
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- The Sexual Revolution
- </hdr>
- <body>
- <p> [Americans discovered that the freedom from fear of unwanted
- pregnancy that was the gift of "the pill" went hand in hand with
- other kinds of sexual freedom.]
- </p>
- <p>(January 24, 1964)
- </p>
- <p> Men with memories ask, "What, again?" The first sexual
- revolution followed World War I, when flaming youth buried the
- Victorian era and anointed itself as the Jazz Age. In many ways
- it was an innocent revolution. In This Side of Paradise, F. Scott
- Fitzgerald alarmed mothers by telling them "how casually their
- daughters were accustomed to being kissed"; today mothers thank
- their stars if kissing is all their daughters are accustomed to.
- </p>
- <p> The rebels of the '60s have parents with only the tattered
- remnants of a code. Adrift in a sea of permissiveness, they have
- little to rebel against. Parents, educators and the guardians of
- morality at large do pull themselves together to say "don't,"
- but they usually sound halfhearted. Closed minds have not
- disappeared, but as a society, the U.S. seems to be dominated
- by what Congregationalist Minister and Educator Robert Elliot
- Fitch calls an "orgy of open-mindedness." Faith and principle are
- far from dead--but what stands out is an often desperate search
- for "new standards for a new age."
- </p>
- <p> Publicly and dramatically, the change is evident in Spectator
- Sex--what may be seen and read. It remains for each man and
- woman to walk through this sexual bombardment and determine for
- themselves what to them seems tasteless or objectionable,
- entertaining or merely dull. A healthy society must assume a
- certain degree of immunity on the part of its people. But no one
- can really calculate the effect this exposure is having on
- individual lives and minds. Above all, it is not an isolated
- phenomenon. It is part and symptom of an era in which morals are
- widely held to be both private and relative, in which pleasure
- is increasingly considered an almost constitutional right rather
- than a privilege, in which self-denial in increasingly seen as
- foolishness rather than virtue.
- </p>
- <p>(April 7, 1967)
- </p>
- <p> "The pill" is a miraculous tablet that contains as little as
- one thirty-thousandth of an ounce of chemical. It costs 1 1/4
- cents to manufacture; a month's supply now sells for $2.00
- retail. It is little more trouble to take on schedule than a
- daily vitamin. Yet in a mere six years it has changed and
- liberated the sex and family life of a large and still growing
- segment of the U.S. population. Of the 39 million American women
- capable of motherhood, 7,000,000 have already taken the pills;
- some 5,700,000 are on them now.
- </p>
- <p> Does the convenient contraceptive promote promiscuity? In
- some cases, no doubt it does--as did the automobile, the drive-
- in movies and the motel. But the consensus among both physicians
- and sociologist is that a girl who is promiscuous on the pill
- would have been promiscuous without it. The more mature of the
- unmarried in the Now Generation say that, far from promoting
- promiscuity, the pills impose a sense of responsibility.
- Formerly, many a young woman rejected premarital relations
- specifically because of her fear of pregnancy. Now, on the
- pills, she has to make the decision according to her own
- conscience.
- </p>
-
- </body>
- </article>
- </text>
-
-